Public beta · Methodology v0.1.0

A transparency layer for India's deputation system. Search any parent Ministry, Department or CCA and see what its rules say, what reports show, and what you should do next — with the signal strength always shown next to the signal.

Deputation: A Win-Win That Deserves Encouragement

Deputation is a rare win-win for both the Government and the employee.

Deputation should be viewed as a mechanism for optimum utilisation and mobility of human resources within the Central Government, rather than merely as the release of an employee from one office to another.

An employee normally seeks deputation for a higher post, better pay or deputation allowance, greater responsibility, or a posting nearer home. Since the posting is chosen rather than imposed, the employee is more likely to be satisfied, motivated and willing to perform at his or her best.

For the Government, the logic is equally strong. Deputation frequently fills a higher and more responsible post. If manpower is scarce, leaving a senior post vacant—where decisions, supervision and important work may suffer—is generally more damaging than leaving a junior post vacant. The Government has not lost an employee; it has simply moved that employee to a position where his services may have greater value.

The lending office’s concern about losing strength is legitimate, but it is a departmental concern—not a loss to the Central Government as a whole. That vacancy can itself be filled through deputation, promotion or permissible ad-hoc arrangements, creating a chain of upward mobility.

At a time when promotional stagnation affects morale across many cadres, deputation can simultaneously fill critical vacancies, improve employee motivation and make better use of existing manpower.

A system that places willing employees where they are more motivated, fills more important vacancies and improves utilisation of Government manpower deserves to be facilitated—not discouraged.

Organisations mapped
Ministries covered
Organisations rated
With official source
Last refreshed

Explore organisations

Featured organisations across friendliness bands. Search above or open any card.

Leaderboard

Two honest views. Rankings only appear once an organisation has enough evidence.

# Organisation Ministry DeFeX Band Confidence Reports
Keep DeFeX honest

Report your deputation experience

DeFeX gets sharper every time someone shares a structured timeline — application, forwarding, NOC, vigilance, relieving. Submissions are anonymous, scanned for officer names (and rejected if found), and aggregated before display.

  • No login. No personal data stored beyond what you choose to share.
  • Free-text fields are character-capped and moderated.
  • Integrity allegations are never published publicly.
Reports analysed
Coverage gap

organisations still have no reports. Yours could be the first.

Methodology

Versioned, public, and revised with a changelog. DeFeX is meant to be auditable.

The formula

DeFeX = clamp(0, 100,  B − Σ Pᵢ + E)

B — base score from Deputation_Allowed: Yes 88 · Allow for some 70 · Allowed with conditions 58 · No 18.

Pᵢ — friction penalties: Vacancy-based −18 · Senior-only −15 · FCFS −8. “Highly beneficial to parent” is not a penalty — it's the standard statutory phrasing. We show it as a condition instead.

E — evidence bonus: +8 with an official OM, +2 with consistent community reports (capped at +8).

Missing data does not reduce DeFeX. It reduces confidence.

Confidence, not just score

Every DeFeX score ships with a confidence band. Confidence rises with: number of reports, presence of an official OM, recency, internal consistency, and how many stages (forwarding, NOC, vigilance, relieving) are covered.

  • High ≥ 0.70 — multiple reports + OM
  • Medium ≥ 0.45 — OM or several reports
  • Low ≥ 0.20 — one report, no OM
  • Insufficient — organisation appears as Unrated

Bands

  • 80–100Deputation-friendly
  • 65–79Generally supportive
  • 50–64Mixed
  • 35–49Restrictive
  • 0–34Very restrictive
  • Unrated (insufficient data)

What we never publish

  • Names of individual officers.
  • Allegations of integrity issues, in any aggregated form.
  • Raw narrative reports — only structured, aggregated signals.

See disclaimer and Right to Correction.

Changelog

    Right to Correction

    Ministries, Departments, Cadre Controlling Authorities and Organisations are welcome to submit official deputation policy documents, corrections or clarifications. We commit to publishing acknowledged corrections within 14 days.

    Disclaimer

    DeFeX is a community- and document-based deputation friendliness index. It is intended to help employees understand patterns, risks and timelines associated with deputation from one government organisation to another. Scores are derived from available reports, official documents where available, and moderated user submissions. DeFeX does not make allegations against any individual officer and should not be treated as an official government rating. Where data is insufficient, organisations are shown as Unrated.